Although details of the partnership were hard to come by (EYH's interim executive director, Sheryl Bize-Boutte, said she'd have to check with the Office of Naval Research before granting an interview), one can divine a possible sign of Navy influence in the location of one of this year's EYH conferences—the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California. "Because this program is at the Naval Postgraduate School, some of the workshops will focus on cool Navy careers," boasts the conference website. Many of the workshop presenters are on the Navy payroll and teach topics like cryptology.
And on the local level, single-sex STEM camps often seem like military recruitment lite. One prominent example is the Pacific Aviation Museum's Flight School for Girls at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. According to its website, the three-day flight program gives girls in grades 6–8 a chance to learn scientific principles of flight through demonstrations and experiments. In addition to classroom instruction led by museum educators and a historical interpreter dressed as Amelia Earhart, there's a day set aside for horsing around with military hardware, donning flight suits, trying out a cool P-40 Warhawk flight simulator, and—wait for it—meeting "women in aviation careers." Who are these latter-day Earharts? None other than Navy pilots, and judging by the photos from recent flight-school sessions posted on the museum's website, they appear to have been given ample time to talk with small groups of girls about STEM opportunities in the Navy.
Military support for single-sex STEM camps can be seen as the latest iteration of an ongoing effort to expand the military's all-volunteer recruiting base. First, by promoting "cool Navy careers" in areas where young women may be underrepresented (like STEM fields), these military partnerships are engaging with what anthropologist Hugh Gusterson calls "feminist militarism"—the complex of cultural attitudes that convey that women can overcome second-class citizenship by serving in the military. By the logic of feminist militarism, it's not enough to enter a traditionally male-dominated field like aviation engineering—to really show you're equal to a man, you need to serve in the Navy.
Secondly, the Pentagon—by pushing the idea of military service on girls as young as 11 and 12—is simply following the advice of its own Joint Advertising Marketing Research Studies program, which warned in its November 2011 "State of the Recruiting Market" report that "if joining the military is not considered by age 17, it likely will not be in later years." The U.S. Army Recruiter Handbook also points out that contact with seventh- and eighth-grade students can "positively impact high-school and postsecondary school recruiting efforts." In other words, get 'em while they're young.
Unfortunately, scientists have been slow to react to the Pentagon's apparent co-optation of STEM instruction. Kathy Barker, a Seattle-based writer with a PhD in microbiology, is working on a study of scientists-as-activists. "I have never found anyone in the scientific community concerned about militarism," Barker told me in a recent phone interview. But Barker herself has bucked that trend, documenting the military's use of STEM programs to recruit and coauthoring a study of high-school military recruiting that was published in the American Journal of Public Health. "Scientists have an acceptance of and complicity with the military that few realize, much less protest," Barker added. "The Navy is using EYH for advertising and recruiting. Everyone wins except the girls, who are collateral damage."
###
